翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Rethen (Leine)
・ Rethera
・ Rethera afghanistana
・ Rethera brandti
・ Rethera komarovi
・ Retheuil
・ Rethika Srinivas
・ Rethinakottai
・ Rethink (record label)
・ Rethink Afghanistan
・ Rethink Communications
・ Rethink Mental Illness
・ RethinkDB
・ Rethinking "Gnosticism"
・ Rethinking India's Past
Rethinking Innateness
・ Rethinking Islam
・ Rethinking Madness
・ Rethinking Marxism
・ Rethinking Mathematics
・ Rethinking Religion in India
・ Rethlager Bach
・ Rethma
・ Rethona
・ Rethona albifasciata
・ Rethona strigosa
・ Rethondes
・ Rethonvillers
・ Rethra
・ Rethroned


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Rethinking Innateness : ウィキペディア英語版
Rethinking Innateness

''Rethinking Innateness: A connectionist perspective on development'' is a book regarding gene/environment interaction, published in 1996 by Jeffrey Elman, Annette Karmiloff-Smith, Elizabeth Bates, Mark Johnson, Domenico Parisi, and Kim Plunkett. It has been cited more than 1,000 times in scientific articles,〔(The Scopus Citation Tracker )〕 and has been nominated as one of the “One hundred most influential works in cognitive science from the 20th Century”.〔http://www.cogsci.umn.edu/OLD/calendar/past_events/millennium/lista.html〕
==Summary==
''Rethinking Innateness'' applied insights from neurobiology and neural network modelling to brain development.
It questioned whether some of the “hard nativist” positions, such as those adopted by Noam Chomsky, Steven Pinker and Elizabeth Spelke, are biologically plausible. For example, the authors challenged a claim by Pinker that children are born with innate domain-specific knowledge of the principles of grammar, by questioning how the knowledge that Pinker suggests might actually be encoded in the genes.
Elman et al. argue that information concerning something as specific as grammatical rules (which they classify as propositional information) could only be encoded as pre-specified “weights” between neurons in the cortex. But they argue that evidence from a number of sources, such as brain plasticity (the ability of a brain to change its response properties during development) shows that information cannot be hard-wired in this way.
Instead, they argue that genes might influence brain development by determining a system’s “architectural constraints”. By establishing the physical structure of a system, they argue that genes would, in effect, by determining the learning algorithms the system employs to respond to the environment. They argue that the specific propositional information in the system would be determined as a result of the system responding to environmental stimulation.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Rethinking Innateness」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.